PLT-A-CEM
Impact Model
Follow locked planning inputs through five years of capacity and engagements.
Sample Data
Sample Data · Illustrative project record. Client sign-in
97
9 professionals
14
4.0
Source: Business plan, Section 10.4 / 8.2
Core engagements and recurring contracts
Direct employees, year end
Locked planning inputs
| Year | Diagnoses | Optimization | Implementation | Recurring | Guidance h | Employees | Core | Team | Per professional |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Y1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 50 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 3.0 |
| Y2 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 100 | 2 | 11 | 3 | 3.7 |
| Y3 | 7 | 7 | 4 | 5 | 150 | 4 | 18 | 5 | 3.6 |
| Y4 | 9 | 10 | 7 | 8 | 200 | 6 | 26 | 7 | 3.7 |
| Y5 | 12 | 14 | 10 | 14 | 250 | 8 | 36 | 9 | 4.0 |
Source: Business plan, Section 10.4 / 8.2
Traceable planning formulas
Core engagements(y) = Diagnoses(y) + Optimization projects(y) + Implementation projects(y)
Internal team(y) = Direct employees(y) + 1 technical lead
Engagements per internal professional(y) = Core engagements(y) ÷ Internal team(y)
Locked planning inputs
Planning model, not contracted work. Monetary figures are excluded from this view.